Oh, well signing up for junk I just make something up. I can't help wondering if the people on the doorstep (if they existed) said they were representing something I might have been interested in being involved with (trs: lying).
I see the attacks on Corbyn’s possible successor, Kier Starmer, have started in the right wing mainstream media. The Daily Heil et al are trying to suggest Starmer was responsible for Carl Beech.
Their paymasters must be really worried about the potential of a Labour Party led by
Starmer and I fully expect to see the sensationalist headline increase in number and frequency in the coming months.
Re: UK politics
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:43 pm
by Regulator
If anyone is interested, there's a really good podcast from the HSJ that looks at, amongst other things, Labour's plans for the NHS. It can be found:
He didn't really say that the monarchy is beyond reproach did he???
Yes, yes he did.
Re: UK politics
Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:10 am
by Greg
lolz
Re: UK politics
Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2019 8:13 am
by Regulator
This says it all about U.K. politics currently...
This just one example of numerous attacks on Corbyn, by those claiming to represent the view of U.K. Jews, following the leaders debate.
Re: UK politics
Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2019 10:07 am
by Mister Paul
Has anyone watched the Farage QT interview? It was lovely. Though he didn't answer many of the awkward questions he showed himself up (again) to be the patronising, uncaring, self-centred weasel that he is.
Has anyone watched the Farage QT interview? It was lovely. Though he didn't answer many of the awkward questions he showed himself up (again) to be the patronising, uncaring, self-centred weasel that he is.
I've seen clip. Your character summary is exactly the reason why I think he should have been on the main debate.